The number 1103, seemingly innocuous at first glance, takes on a complex and multifaceted meaning when examined in context. Its appearance in the legal citation *Alsaifullah, 96 AD3d 1103, 1103, lv denied 19 NY3d 944* immediately establishes its significance within the realm of New York State appellate law. This article will explore the legal implications of this citation, while also delving into the diverse ways the number 1103 manifests itself geographically and digitally, demonstrating the surprising breadth of its reach.
1103 in the Legal Landscape: A Case Study in Discretion and Denial
The citation *Alsaifullah, 96 AD3d 1103, 1103, lv denied 19 NY3d 944* refers to a New York appellate court case. The repetition of "1103" suggests a significant portion of the reported decision, potentially encompassing the court's reasoning and ultimate ruling. The "lv denied" portion indicates that leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) was denied. This denial, in the context of the concluding statement "we therefore conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to entertain the pro se motion," paints a picture of a case where the lower court's decision was upheld. The pro se nature of the motion, meaning it was filed by the litigant without legal representation, adds another layer of complexity. The court's refusal to entertain the motion likely stemmed from procedural irregularities, insufficient legal arguments, or a lack of merit in the claim itself.
The precise details of the *Alsaifullah* case remain elusive without access to the full text of the opinion. However, the citation itself highlights a crucial aspect of the judicial process: the exercise of judicial discretion. Appellate courts have the power to decide which cases they will review, and the denial of leave to appeal is a common occurrence. This inherent discretion is vital for managing the court's workload and ensuring that only cases raising significant legal issues or presenting compelling arguments reach the highest court. The court's affirmation that it did not abuse its discretion reinforces the legitimacy and propriety of its decision in refusing the pro se motion. This reinforces the importance of proper legal procedure and representation, even if the underlying legal merits of the case might be debatable.
The legal significance of 1103 in this context is not about the number itself, but rather its function as a unique identifier within the vast legal landscape of New York State. It serves as a reference point for legal scholars, researchers, and practitioners seeking to understand the court's approach to pro se motions and the exercise of judicial discretion in similar cases. The citation allows for future analysis and comparison, contributing to the ongoing development of legal precedent and jurisprudence.
1103 in the Digital Realm: Social Media and Online Presence
current url：https://kblgcx.d767y.com/global/1103-lv-46929